Legal Opinion

Gray v. Commodity Credit Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 28, 1947No. 11287PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing the complaint and declaring the rights of the parties under a contract entered into between appellee, as purchaser, and appellants, who sue on behalf of all growers of muscat grapes who sold to appellee in 1944, as sellers.

Appellants, in urging a reversal, raise three points:

First, they contend that the muscat grape growers are deprived of their property without due process because appellee distributed its funds [derived from the sale of grapes previously sold to it by the growers] to growers of all varieties on a fresh tonnage basis, rather than…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gray v. Commodity Credit CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1945

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fanchon & Marco v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1951
  2. Johnston v. First National Bank & Trust Co. of JoplinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Lewis v. AndersonDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1947
  4. Errett v. RasmussenDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1976
  5. Galante v. COMMODITY CREDIT CORP.District Court, S.D. California · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API