Legal Opinion

MDK, Inc. v. Village of Grafton

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided November 18, 2004No. 03-C-0026PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

ADELMAN, District Judge.

Plaintiff MDK, Inc. (“MDK”) brings this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that defendant Village of Grafton’s ordinance regulating sexually oriented businesses, Ch. 9.35, is facially invalid under the First Amendment. Plaintiff contends that the ordinance effectively prohibited it from offering erotic dancing at a tavern that it owned in the Village and that as a result it is entitled to damages. Before me now are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment on the issue of liability. 1

I. THE ORDINANCE

Under Ch. 9.35, “sexually oriented…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Schmitty's City Nightmare, LLC v. City of Fond Du LacDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2005
  2. Metropolitan Milwaukee Ass'n of Commerce v. Milwaukee CountyDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2005
  3. Eggert Group, LLC v. Town of HarrisonDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2005
  4. Kissinger v. Fort Wayne Cmty. Sch.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2018
  5. Richland Bookmart, Inc. v. Knox CountyDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API