Legal Opinion

Cole v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 9, 1985No. 83-1093Published

1Per curiam

There is no merit in any of the appellant’s points which concern the multiple convictions below. California v. Prysock, 453 U.S. 355, 101 S.Ct. 2806, 69 L.Ed.2d 696 (1981); United States v. Contreras, 667 F.2d 976 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 849, 103 S.Ct. 109, 74 L.Ed.2d 97 (1982); Parker v. State, 421 So.2d 712 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Hernandez v. State, 323 So.2d 318 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975). Cole’s sentences are modified so that the three-year minimum mandatory provisions imposed under section 775.087(2), Fla.Stat. (1981) are to run concurrently rather than consecutively. Palmer v.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. California v. PrysockSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. United States v. Freddy Antonio ContrerasCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
  3. State v. AmesSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  4. Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  5. Hernandez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API