Legal Opinion

Blum v. Holder

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided March 18, 2013No. Civil Action No. 11-12229-JLTPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

TAURO, District Judge.

I. Introduction

Plaintiffs Sarahjane Blum, Ryan Shapiro, Lana Lehr, Lauren Gazzola, and Iver Robert Johnson III, dedicated animal rights activists, bring this facial and as-applied challenge to the Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act (“AETA”),1 a criminal statute that prohibits acts of violence against animal enterprises and the persons and entities connected with those enterprises. Plaintiffs argue that the AETA is overly broad and discriminates on the basis of content and viewpoint, in violation of the First Amendment to the Constitution, and is impermissibly…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Clapper v. Amnesty International USASupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Babbitt v. United Farm Workers National UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Laird v. TatumSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Blum v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API