Legal Opinion

Spellmire v. Third Nat. Bank

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 18, 1940No. 173Published

1Opinion of the Court

GIBSON, District Judge.

The plaintiffs were stockholders of The Third National Bank of Pittsburgh, who, after assessment by the Comptroller, paid to the receiver the par value of the stock held by them. The defendants named in the complaint are The Third National Bank of Pittsburgh, Andrew B. Berger, its receiver, and a number of stockholders of the bank from whom collection has not been made of the Comptroller’s assessment.

The collections of the receiver upon the assessments were sufficient to pay creditors and depositors and the expenses of administration, but were not enough to fully repay…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Richmond v. IronsSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Cook County National Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Lex v. Selway Steel CorporationSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  4. Putnam v. MisochiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  5. Falvey v. Foreman-State Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API