Georgia M. Beatty v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
1Per curiam
We have fully considered the asserted errors of law in our original opinion, 5th Cir., 667 F.2d 501. Finding absolutely no merit to petitioner’s claims, we deny the petition for rehearing but add the following comments.
Ms. Beatty, whose brief on petition for rehearing lies perilously near the line separating advocacy from contempt, asserts that we have failed to address the issues raised and therefore “are violating the law” and are guilty of “high crimes”. First, we point out to petitioner that under Rule 21 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, this Court…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Compañia General De Tabacos De Filipinas v. Collector of Internal RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Lawrence E. Bowling v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Georgia M. Beatty v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
3Cited by8 opinions
- Leonard Perkins v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Thomas A. Moore, Sr. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- Arnold T. Forseth, Gerald R. Formsma and Constance Y. Formsma v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Bobbie J. Roberts v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Jerry W. Counts and Rae A. Counts v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.