Legal Opinion

Mary Duston v. Daymark Foods, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided September 9, 1997No. 96-3817PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge.

Daymark Foods, Inc. (Daymark) appeals from the judgment entered by the district court 2 on the jury’s verdict in favor of Mary Duston. We affirm.

Mary and her husband, Arthur, worked as team truck drivers for Daymark, delivering fresh flowers to various locations across the United States. On April 26, 1994, the Dustons drove from Atlanta, Georgia, to Miami, Florida, to pick up flowers. They returned to Atlanta and, around midday on April 28, continued on to Indianapolis, Indiana, where they arrived between ten and eleven that evening. From that time until six or seven…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Ouachita Wilderness Institute v. MergenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  3. Catlett v. StewartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  4. Timothy R. Sherbert v. Alcan Aluminum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  5. Bolstad v. PergesonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Teska v. Potlatch Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API