Legal Opinion

Peitsmeyer v. Omar Baking Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 17, 1952No. 4799PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHornbeck, P. J.

This is an appeal on questions of law from a judgment of the Common Pleas Court entered on the verdict of a jury which found against the plaintiff on her amended petition and against the defendant Omar Baking Company on its cross-petition.

The amended petition of plaintiff contained two causes of action. The first cause of action was for personal injuries claimed to have been suffered by plaintiff in an automobile accident. The second cause of action was for damage to the automobile, which was not .owned by the plaintiff.

The amended petition charged the defendants with joint negligence, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mielke v. LeebersonOhio Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Wolf v. SulikSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
  3. Douglas v. HubbardOhio Court of Appeals · 1951
  4. Gratziano v. GradyOhio Court of Appeals · 1948
  5. Nosse v. RoseOhio Court of Appeals · 1933

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Reeves v. City of SpringfieldOhio Court of Appeals · 1960
  2. Hoegler v. HamperOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Veltri v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API