Legal Opinion
Unigene Laboratories, Inc. v. Apotex, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided August 25, 2011No. 2010-1006PublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RADER, Chief Judge.
The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York heard a dispute between Apotex, Inc. and Apotex Corp. (“Apotex”), the appellants, and Uni-gene Laboratories, Inc. and Upsher-Smith Laboratories, Inc. (collectively, “Uni-gene”), the appellees, over claim 19 of U.S. Patent No. RE40,812E (“'812E patent”). On cross-motions for summary judgment, the district court granted Unigene’s motion that the patent would not have been obvious at the time of invention. Unigene Labs., Inc., v. Apotex, Inc. (“Summary Judgment Opinion”), No. 06-CV-5571, Dkt. No. 175, slip…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food MacHinery & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Panduit Corp. v. All States Plastic Manufacturing Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Nobelpharma AB v. Implant Innovations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD. v. Sandoz, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Outside the Box Innovations, LLC v. Travel Caddy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Watson Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Mark S. Rasmuson and Brenda S. Rasmuson, Husband and Wife v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Jenkins v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.