Legal Opinion
Stevens v. Carl Schmid, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided September 17, 1934No. 334PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SWAN, Circuit Judge.
The patent in suit, No. 1,605,445 to Fred L. Killian, dated November 2, 1926, was acquired by the plaintiff by assignment. It describes a machine for forming an -annular bead on the open end of toy balloons, finger cots, nipples, gloves, and other tubular rubber articles. The machine of the patent has a power-driven endless belt provided with a row of upstanding pins upon each of which the operator places a “bottle” or form coated with a thin film of unvulcanized rubber. The endless belt carries each form past a rotary brush set at an inclino and so arranged that the lower…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Winans v. DenmeadSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
- Kendall v. WinsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
- United States v. Société Anonyme Des Anciens Establissements CailSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Dean Rubber Mfg. Co. v. KillianCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
- Apex Electrical Mfg. Co. v. Maytag Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
- Schreyer v. Casco Products Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1951
- Upjohn Company v. Italian Drugs Importing Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1961
- F. E. Myers & Brother Co. v. Goulds Pumps, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1950
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.