Legal Opinion

Brown v. Mechanics' & Traders' National Bank

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1890PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from judgment on report of referee. Action by Timothy I. Brown, as executor, against the Mechanics’ & Traders’ national Bank of the city of New York. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment for defendant entered on trial by a referee.

1Opinion of the CourtDaniels, J.

This action has been brought to recover the amount of a deficiency remaining after the sale of mortgaged premises, upon the foreclosure of a mortgage executed by the testator to secure his bond. He was the president of the defendant, and the theory of the action is that he gave the bond and mortgage for the use and benefit of the defendant, and that the defendant is equitably bound to pay this deficiency. The plaintiff, gave evidence tending to prove these facts, and requested the referee to find them to have been proven, but he refused to do so, and to his refusal the plaintiff excepted.…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Brown v. Mechanics & Traders' BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  2. Brown v. Mechanics & Traders' BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  3. Brown v. Mechanics' & Traders' BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API