Legal Opinion
Kram v. Kram
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 15, 1967PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
94 N.J. Super. 539 (1967)
229 A.2d 285
BRONYA KRAM, PLAINTIFF,
v.
PHILIP KRAM, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.
Decided March 15, 1967.
Mr. Hyman Halpern for plaintiff.
Mr. Irving Mandelbaum for defendant (Messrs. Irving & Barry R. Mandelbaum, attorneys).
HARTMAN, J.C.C. (temporarily assigned).
Plaintiff seeks a declaratory judgment that she is still defendant's lawful wife and that an ex parte divorce secured by him in the State of Florida is of no force and effect in New Jersey.
No testimony was offered by either side at the trial. Determination of the issues was based on…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Lawlor v. National Screen Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Southern Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Sherrer v. SherrerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Johnson v. MuelbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Culver v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
- Kram v. KramNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
- Culver v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
- DCPP VS. J.Y., IN THE KINSHIP MATTER OF J.T. (FL-09-0156-10, HUDSON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) (RECORD IMPOUNDED)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2021
- Emery v. Borough of Lewistown, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Mifflin County1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.