United States v. Skinner & Ruddock, Inc.
District Court, E.D. South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WYCHE, District Judge.
This suit was commenced on April 9, 1955, by Noland Company, Inc. as use-plaintiff in the name of the United States of America, pursuant to the provisions of the Miller Act (40 U.S.C.A. § 270a et seq.) for certain amounts due to the use-plaintiff for materials sold to Williams Piping and Heating Company, for which indebtedness the defendant Skinner & Ruddock, Inc. and its bonding company, the defendant United States Guarantee Company were alleged to be liable under the Miller Act and under a bond given by the defendants pursuant to the Act.
On March 29, 1956, the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Texas Portland Cement Co. v. McCordSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Fleisher Engineering & Construction Co. v. United States Ex Rel. HallenbeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States Ex Rel. American Radiator & Sanitary Corp. v. Northwestern Engineering Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
- United States v. WoodCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
- United States Ex Rel. Bruce Co. v. Fraser Const. Co.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1949
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States of America to the Use of Wayne Bailey D/B/A Wayne Bailey Trucking v. Elmer J. Freethy, Individually and D/B/A Elmer J. Freethy CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- California Electric Supply Co. v. United Pacific Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- United States Ex Rel. James E. Simon Co. v. Ardelt-Horn Construction Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1970
- United States ex rel. John T. Evanick & Co. v. Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1960
- Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co. v. Terminal Construction Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.