Legal Opinion

Hillside Coal & Iron Co. v. Sterrick Creek Coal Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 24, 1913No. Appeal, No. 154PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal, No. 154, Jan. T., 1911, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Lackawanna Co., Sept. T., 1909, No. 1199, for plaintiff in case of Hillside Coal & Iron Co. v. Sterriek Creek Coal Company. Assumpsit for royalties under a coal lease.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 154, Jan. T., 1911, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Lackawanna Co., Sept. T., 1909, No. 1199, for plaintiff in case of Hillside Coal & Iron Co. v. Sterriek Creek Coal Company. Assumpsit for royalties under a coal lease. The case was tried by the court without a jury under the Act of April 22,1874. Edwards, P. J., filed the following opinion: The controversy between the parties to this case involves the interpretation or construction of the terms of a coal lease, in which the plaintiff is lessor, and the defendant, lessee. The particular paragraph of the lease to be considered…

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

Upon a careful consideration of this appeal by the *375whole court, a majority are of opinion that the judgment should be affirmed for the reasons stated by the learned President Judge of the Common Pleas.

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tustin v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  2. Corona Coal & Coke Co. v. DickinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  3. Hodgdon v. Lehigh & Wilkes-Barre Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API