Levine-Seidman v. Seidman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*884Although the Family Court found that the father failed to show an “unanticipated” and “unforeseen” change in circumstances warranting a downward modification of his child support obligation, because the father’s obligation was not contained in a stipulation of settlement that had been incorporated but not merged into a judgment of divorce, the standard that should have been applied is “a substantial change in circumstances” (Matter of Mandelowitz v Bodden, 68 AD3d 871, 874 [2009] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Matter of Marrale v Marrale, 44 AD3d 773, 774 [2007]; cf. Matter of Boden…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- MATTER OF POWERS v. PowersNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Boden v. BodenNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Mandelowitz v. BoddenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Marrale v. MarraleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Talty v. TaltyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Matter of Addimando v. HuertaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Matter of Guevara v. VillatoroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Braun v. AbenantiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Braun v. AbenantiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Montgomery v. PrioleauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.