Legal Opinion

United States v. James W. Lloyd

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 19, 1970No. 27414PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal arises from appellant’s conviction after a jury trial of conspiracy to make, possess, pass and cause to be made, possessed and passed certain counterfeit twenty dollar ($20.00) federal reserve notes. 1

Appellant Lloyd raises nine specifications of error to support a reversal. After a careful study of the entire record in its bearing upon these numerous contentions, we conclude that they are completely lacking in substance. Accordingly, the conviction must stand.

Three of appellant’s specifications of error pertain to the credibility of the corroborating testimony of a prosecution…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Braverman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Patricia Lebouef Murphy, as Administratrix of the Estate of Edward Fontenot, Deceased, Etc. v. Houma Well Service, and Eva C. Fontenot, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  5. James Leo Huth v. Southern Pacific CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. United States v. ElliottCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  2. United States v. Mayo Perez, DefendantsappellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  3. United States v. PetersenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
  4. United States v. Patrick C. RichersonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
  5. United States v. Guadalupe M. MoradoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API