Legal Opinion · Dissent

Tulley v. City of Jacksonville

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 4, 2015No. 1140049Published

1DissentShaw, Justice

I respectfully dissent. I am not persuaded that Ordinance No. 0-514-10 is *826facially unconstitutional. The Court of Criminal Appeals stated:

“[S]ubsection (c) of Ordinance No. 0-514-10 declares that the conduct proscribed by § 13A-11-52, Ala.Code 1975, is an offense against the City, and subsection (d) of that same ordinance includes a provision for punishment for that offense.

Section 13A-11-52 clearly prohibits certain conduct—namely, it prohibits a person from ‘carrying] a pistol about his person on premises not his own or under his control.’ The ‘law of this State’—that is, the Code of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. BatchelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Tulley v. City of JacksonvilleCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API