Legal Opinion · Dissent
Tulley v. City of Jacksonville
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided September 4, 2015No. 1140049Published
1DissentShaw, Justice
I respectfully dissent. I am not persuaded that Ordinance No. 0-514-10 is *826facially unconstitutional. The Court of Criminal Appeals stated:
“[S]ubsection (c) of Ordinance No. 0-514-10 declares that the conduct proscribed by § 13A-11-52, Ala.Code 1975, is an offense against the City, and subsection (d) of that same ordinance includes a provision for punishment for that offense.
Section 13A-11-52 clearly prohibits certain conduct—namely, it prohibits a person from ‘carrying] a pistol about his person on premises not his own or under his control.’ The ‘law of this State’—that is, the Code of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. BatchelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Tulley v. City of JacksonvilleCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2014