Legal Opinion

TPI International Airways v. Rosenfeld

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 23, 1991No. 90-0941PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

REVERSED. We agree with appellant that the trial court erred in denying its discovery requests of the appellee. See United States v. Denaro, 647 F.Supp. 112 (S.D.Fla.1986); and United States v. Ballard, 779 F.2d 287 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1109, 106 S.Ct. 1518, 89 L.Ed.2d 916 (1986). We disagree with appellant that it is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law on the alleged fraudulent transfers but we agree that any trial or further proceedings after discovery should be conducted in accord with section 56.29, Florida Statutes (1987). See Treated Timber Prods., Inc. v. S & A…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Tony Davis BALLARD, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  2. Treated Timber Products, Inc. v. S & A Associates, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
  3. United States v. DenaroDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1986

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rosenfeld v. TPI INTERN. AIRWAYSDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API