Legal Opinion

Stanek v. National Bank

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 3, 1988No. Docket 92287PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMacKenzie, J.

Plaintiffs appeal by leave granted from a circuit court order affirming an order of the district court which granted defendant’s motion for summary disposition and dismissed plaintiffs’ cause of action with prejudice. We reverse.

On February 18, 1985, plaintiff Helen Stanek wrote a $197 personal check payable to Western Glass Company and drawn on plaintiffs’ account with defendant bank. The next day, February 19, 1985, at 9:35 A.M., Helen Stanek went to a bank branch and issued a stop payment order on the check. According to bank records, the stop payment order was entered into defendant’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gillen v. Maryland National BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  2. Chute v. Bank One of Akron, N.A.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Dunbar v. First National Bank of ScotiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  4. Levy v. Chemical BankNew York District Court · 1984

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cudnik v. William Beaumont HospitalMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Gornicki v. M&T BankNew York Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API