Legal Opinion

W.M. And A. Transit Company v. Clara Radecka

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided February 8, 1962No. 16560PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DANAHER, Circuit Judge.

This case presented a classic res ipsa loquitur situation. The appellee proved that while a passenger on the appellant’s bus, she was violently thrown from her seat, rendered unconscious, and otherwise seriously injured when the driver suddenly applied the brakes and stopped the bus. After the appellant had offered evidence to explain the occurrence, the trial judge denied the appellant’s motion for a directed verdict, and later, its motion for judgment n. o. v. We find no error with respect to such denials, for if other rulings complained of be correct, the evidence…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Sher v. De HavenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
  3. Frank R. Jelleff, Inc. v. Blanche K. BradenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
  4. Williams v. Capital Transit Co. Williams v. DouglasCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
  5. Lachman v. Pennsylvania Greyhound Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ohio Valley Construction Co., Inc. v. DewDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. City-Wide Trucking Corporation v. Emma FordCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
  3. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API