Legal Opinion

Campbell v. McLaughlin

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided February 10, 1926No. 576-4395PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpeer, J.

Plaintiffs in error instituted this suit against defendants in error in the usual form of trespass to try title to recover 600 acres of land in Hardin county. The land was embraced in the Smith and Davidson grants and also in the David Choate grant, the Choate being junior to the Smith and Davidson, and there being a conflict involving the Choate. On June 3, 1873, all the title of David Choate to the land in controversy was sold under execution, and the plaintiffs in error are the owners of that title. The defendants in error claimed the land under David Choate and his wife, Mary Choate, as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Houston East & West Texas Railway Co. v. De WaltTexas Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Barrett v. FeatherstoneTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Floyd v. Kulp Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  4. Campbell v. McLoughlinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  5. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. GogginCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Swilley v. McCainTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Kirby Lumber Corp. v. Southern Lumber Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Corn v. Crosby County Cattle Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1930
  4. Texas Associates, Inc. v. Joe Bland Const. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1949
  5. Wise v. HaynesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API