Legal Opinion

Parish v. Columbia National Bank

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1932PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

Defendants urge that because there is no allegation in the complaint that defendant, W. P. Olds, was in possession of the property in controversy when the action was instituted, the action should be dismissed. The answer of defendant, W. P. Olds, alleges that said “defendant is a purchaser for value of the said personal property and received the same in due course and without notice of any claim that the plaintiff had or could assert against the same.” And also: “That in February, 1930, * * * this defendant, * * * signed and delivered to said Columbia National Bank, of Portland, his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. La Vie v. CrosbyOregon Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Miller v. Peoples Saving BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. Farmers' Loan & Mortgage Co. v. HansenOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Thompson v. ClarkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hager v. GordonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API