Legal Opinion

Miller v. White

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 12, 1935No. 5026PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLS, Judge.

Plaintiff seeks, under the provisions of Act No. 55 of 1926, to eject defendant from a predial estate in Webster parish.. In article 1 of his petition he alleges .“that Sam T. White, resident of Webster Parish, Louisiana, was the tenant of your petitioner for the year 1934 * * * ” of the land in question. In subsequent articles he asserts the expiration of the lease, the giving of the required notice to vacate, and the refusal of defendant to do so.

In answer to the rule, defendant admitted the allegations of article 1 and the retention of possession. He denied the expiration of…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Miller v. WhiteSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
  2. Miller v. WhiteLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API