Legal Opinion

Martin v. New Trinidad Lake Asphalt Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1903PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by the defendant, The New Trinidad Lake Asphalt Company, Limited, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 21st day of October, 1903, denying tlie defendant’s motion to vacate an order for the discovery and inspection of defendant’s books and accounts, and modifying such order for discovery.

1Opinion of the Court

Patterson, J.:

This appeal is from an order denying a motion to vacate an order for an inspection and discovery of books. The order sought to be vacated requires the defendant to give to the plaintiff a discovery and inspection, and permission to take copies of statements and accounts described in a petition, and provides that the discovery and *473inspection be made by requiring the defendant to deliver to the plaintiff, on or before a date fixed, sworn copies of statements and accounts, and, if such statements are not furnished, then to deposit tiie books of account of the defendant and of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. F. W. Seagrist, Jr., Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  2. C. & C. Electric Co. v. Walker Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  3. Tayler v. American Ribbon Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ballenberg v. WahnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  2. Ballenberg v. WahnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  3. Dannenberg v. HellerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API