Legal Opinion

Lilly v. Marcum

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided February 9, 1926PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Commissioner Sandidge

Affirming.

Grant E. Lilly and others brought this suit against C. Marcum to recover a tract of land in Irvine. The jury found for Marcum, and plaintiffs have appealed.

Appellants and appellee are adjoining landowners, and the case turns on the proper location of their dividing lin,e, which is described in the- deed as follows:

“Beginning at the town lots at one corner of Norton and Noland and Powell, thence a straight line running with th'e line of the lots between Norton and Noland to Clay’s back line on the mountain.”

The location of the line depends…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Harper v. HarperCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1874
  2. Louisville Chemical Works v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1871
  3. Louisville Rock & Lime Co. v. KerrCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1879

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Perry v. Ernest R. Hamilton Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1972
  2. Couch's Adm'r v. BlackCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1945
  3. Halteman v. GroganCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API