Legal Opinion

Kendrick v. Florida Parole Commission

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 26, 2003No. 1D03-1586PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We determine that the circuit court departed from the essential requirements of law when it denied Kendrick’s petition for writ of mandamus without issuing an order to show cause. It appears that the sworn allegations concerning the absence of a subpoenaed witness at the Conditional Release revocation hearing were sufficient to state a preliminary basis for relief such that an order to show cause should have issued. See Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles v. Snell, 832 So.2d 177 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002); Evergreen Tree Treasurers of Charlotte County, Inc. v. Charlotte County Bd. of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Evergreen Tree Treas. of Charlotte County, Inc. v. Charlotte Cty. Bd. of County CommissionersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  2. Rightler v. POMPANO BEACH POLICE & FIREMAN'SDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  3. Department of Highway Safety & Motor Vehicles v. SnellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Duckworth v. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONSDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API