Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Cleary

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1891PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from special term, New York county. Affirmed. Action by Kate Reynolds against Catherine Cleary. . From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtDaniels, J.

The action was brought upon a contract for the sale and conveyance of real estate known as “527 West Forty-Fifth Street” in the city of New York. By the contract the defendant covenanted to execute and deliver to the plaintiff “a proper deed containing a general warranty and the usual full covenants for the conveying and assuring to her or them the fee-simple of the said premises free from all incumbrance except as aforesaid,” which exception included a mortgage upon the property, amounting to the sum of $5,000. A deed was tendered for the performance of the agreement, which was refused by…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Trustees of Columbia College v. . ThacherNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Fleming v. . BurnhamNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  3. Vought v. . WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  4. Wetmore v. . BruceNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  5. Carleton v. . CarletonNew York Court of Appeals · 1881

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kerrigan v. BackusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  2. Moubray v. G. & M. Improvement Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
  3. Kerrigan v. BackusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API