Legal Opinion

Starr Cash Car Co. v. Reinhardt

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided December 5, 1892PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from city court, general term. Action by the Stari; Cash Car Company against Aaron Reinhardt and Henry Reinhardt. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendants appeal. Reversed.

1Opinion of the CourtPryor, J.

The action is for the purchase price of 15 cash carriers, sold and delivered by the plaintiff to the defendants. The answer, by not denying, admits the price and the sale and delivery of the cash carriers, and then proceeds to plead a counterclaim, as follows: That there was on the premises of the defendants a certain car system; that when the plaintiff placed its service in the store of the defendants it took to itself the old service of the defendants, and applied the same to its own use and benefit, without the knowledge *873of the defendants; that the reasonable value of the said old service…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Terry v. . MungerNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Edgerton v. . PageNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  3. Boreel v. . LawtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  4. McKnight v. DunlopNew York Supreme Court · 1848
  5. Halleck v. MixerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Braithwaite v. AkinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Siebrecht v. Siegel-Cooper Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
  3. Jansen v. DolanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1911
  4. Robison v. RobisonUtah Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Kleinbohe v. Hoffman HouseNew York Supreme Court · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API