Contas v. Bradford
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 55, Jan. T., 1903, by defendants, from decree of C. P. McKean Co., Dec. T., 1902, No. 1, on bill in equity in case of A. Contas v. Bradford, Geo. H. Potter, Mayor, and Moses P. Wooley, Street Commissioner. Bill in- equity for an injunction.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 55, Jan. T., 1903, by defendants, from decree of C. P. McKean Co., Dec. T., 1902, No. 1, on bill in equity in case of A. Contas v. Bradford, Geo. H. Potter, Mayor, and Moses P. Wooley, Street Commissioner. Bill in- equity for an injunction. Morrison, P. J., filed the following opinion: FINDINGS OF FACT. 1. By written stipulation dated October 25, 1902, signed by the solicitors for all parties, it is agreed that the hearing in this case shall be a final one, the printing of the bill and answer by defendant being waived, and it being agreed that the case is regularly at issue. It is…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
Wé can add nothing to what has been so well and concisely said in demonstration of the correctness of his judgment by the learned judge of the court below. All the assignments of error are overruled and the judgment is affirmed on the opinion of the court below.
2Cited by7 opinions
- Commonwealth v. McHughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- P.R. v. Pennsylvania Department of Public WelfareCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Borough of Ebensburg v. Prevailing Wage Appeals BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Maine Turnpike Authority v. BrennanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975
- Noel v. SummitMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.