Legal Opinion
Horton v. Martin
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided June 7, 2005No. 04-1142UnpublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Raymond Lester Horton, proceeding pro se, appeals a district court’s order dismissing his civil rights complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).
Seeking monetary and equitable relief, Horton sued the Michigan Parole Board, the director Bill Martin of the Michigan Department of Corrections, an administrative law judge Gary Kasenow, a parole board field programs manager Larry Bar-an,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Dennis v. SparksSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Temujin Kensu v. Allen C. Haigh Tom Bell Yvonne Murzen Sandy Grant Linda HayesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Jeffrey Hughes v. Zane DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2024
- Anthony Draine v. Veronica LeavyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Terry Krukemyer v. James ForcumCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Anthony Draine v. Veronica LeavyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Anthony Draine v. Veronica LeavyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.