Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Schaub

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 21, 1932PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.

The plaintiff’s motion to set aside the verdict was denied November 20th, 1931; judgment on the verdict was entered on the same date; on December 2d, the plaintiff filed an appeal from the judgment and assigned, only, error in denying the motion. The appellee asserts that the appeal is ineffective because taken from the judgment instead of specifically from the denial of the motion to set aside the verdict. The present Rules for Appellate Procedure (Practice Book, insert, p. 306) provide in § 2 that the party appealing from a decision upon a motion to set aside a verdict shall file his appeal…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Grant v. GrantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
  2. Hull v. ThomsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
  3. Downey v. GuilfoileSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
  4. Skladzien v. W. M. Sutherland Building & Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1924

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. KurvinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  2. Lengel v. New Haven Gas Light Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
  3. Braithwaite v. LeeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
  4. Costello v. CostelloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
  5. In Re Houser's EstateNebraska Supreme Court · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API