Bliss v. Heasty
Illinois Supreme Court
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county ; the Hon. John G. Rogers, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Walker
It appears that .appellees, who were traders in Marshall-town, .in Iowa, ordered of appellants, wholesale grocers in Chicago, through their traveling agent, a number of barrels of dried fruit. It was to be of choice quality, and appellants were so advised by their agent. The fruit ivas shipped to appellees, who received it, but not regarding it of the quality ordered they returned it to appellants Avithout explanation. On receiving it, they credited appellees with the fruit at AA'liat they claim Avas the market price, being íavo or three cents less on the pound than they had charged appellees…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Bump v. BettsNew York Supreme Court · 1838
3Cited by6 opinions
- Miller v. KearnesArizona Supreme Court · 1935
- Damron v. Sweetser, Caldwell & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1885
- Samuel v. AgnewIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
- Lutz v. Roberts Cotton Oil Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1912
- Gutschenritter v. WhitmoreSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.