Legal Opinion
Kohr v. Weinberger
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 26, 1974No. Civ. A. 73-1698PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FOGEL, District Judge.
This action, brought by plaintiff Paul Kohr on behalf of himself and similarly situated male recipients of social security benefits, challenges the constitutionality of § 215(b)(3) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 415(b)(3), because that provision accords females receiving social security payments under the terms of that subsection more favorable benefit computation than their male counterparts.
A three judge court was constituted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2282, 2284. All relevant facts have been stipulated, and the case can be decided on the cross motions…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Frontiero v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Flemming v. NestorSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Califano v. WebsterSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Arp v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Jablon v. Secretary of Health, Education & WelfareDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1975
- Waldie v. SchlesingerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- Vorchheimer v. School District of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.