Legal Opinion

State v. Neil

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 19, 2019No. 18AP-1001, 18AP-1003 & 18AP-1004PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as State v. Neil,

2019-Ohio-3793.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State of Ohio, : Nos. 18AP-1001 Plaintiff-Appellee, : (C.P.C. No. 12CR-5963) 18AP-1003 : (C.P.C. No. 13CR-1308) v. 18AP-1004 : (C.P.C. No. 13CR-4174) Miguel E. Neil, : (REGULAR CALENDAR) Defendant-Appellant. : D E C I S I O N Rendered on September 19, 2019 On brief: Ron O'Brien, Prosecuting Attorney, and Valerie Swanson, for appellee. On brief: Miguel E. Neil, pro se. APPEALS from the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas BROWN, J. {¶ 1} In these consolidated appeals, defendant-appellant, Miguel…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Saffle v. ParksSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Carpenter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  4. Chaidez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Tyler v. CainSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. PraterOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
  2. State v. TaylorOhio Court of Appeals · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API