Pye v. Peterson
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Grimes. Tried below before the Hon. James R. Burnett. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Gould, Associate Justice.
The appellee brought this suit to enjoin the enforcement of an ordinance of the city of Havasota establishing fire limits, declaring wooden buildings thereafter erected within these limits to be nuisances, and providing for the removal of such buildings and the punishment of parties erecting them. The injunction was granted, and, on the final hearing, was made perpetual, and from this judgment the city has prosecuted an appeal. Whether, under its charter, the city was empowered to pass such an ordinance, is the sole question presented for our consideration.
The charter…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Brady v. North Western InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
- Mayor of Hudson v. ThorneNew York Court of Chancery · 1838
- Respublica v. DuquetSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1799
- Douglass v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1830
- Booth v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1821
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Spann v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1921
- Spann v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1921
- Brown v. City of GalvestonTexas Supreme Court · 1903
- Crossman v. City of GalvestonTexas Supreme Court · 1923
- City of Paris v. SturgeonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.