Legal Opinion
Alaska Limestone Corp. v. Hodel
District Court, D. Alaska
Decided August 12, 1985No. A 82-392 CivPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FITZGERALD, Chief Judge.
This cause comes before the court on plaintiff Alaska Limestone’s motion of July 17, 1985, for an order extending time to file a notice of appeal. Alaska Limestone seeks to appeal a final judgment of this court entered April 12, 1985, 614 F.Supp. 642, which granted the government’s motion for summary judgment. The two issues raised in this matter are whether this court has jurisdiction to consider the merits of this motion and, if so, whether Alaska Limestone has met the pertinent requirements of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. For the reasons set…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Theodore R. Gooch v. Skelly Oil Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974
- Jacqueline Selph v. Council of the City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Islamic Republic of Iran v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- State of Oregon v. Champion International CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Jeffrey L. Sprout and Holly Renee Sprout v. Farmers Insurance Exchange, a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Alaska Limestone Corp. v. HodelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- J.P. Fyfe, Inc. of Florida v. Bradco Supply Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1989
- Alaska Limestone Corporation v. HodelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986