Legal Opinion

New York Talking Machine Co. v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided August 1, 1928No. Docket No. 12363PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*160OPINION.

Smith :

With the invested capital question contained in the second assignment of error settled by stipulation, the only remaining issue on the merits is that of the salary deductions for the years 1918 and 1919. The respondent contends that the salary deductions taken in *161the petitioners’ returns for those years and now claimed as an expense deduction are unreasonably large an'd represent a distribution of dividends in the guise of compensation for services rendered. It same was duly authorized by the petitioners’ directors.

We do not believe that the facts which we have set out above at…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Affiliated Enterprises, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1940
  2. Dun & Bradstreet Corp. v. Comptroller of the TreasuryCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  3. Kay, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1949
  4. Long Island Drug Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1937
  5. New York Talking Mach. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API