Legal Opinion
Zuckerman v. Hofrichter & Quiat, P.A.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided January 12, 1993No. 92-2532PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON MOTION TO REVIEW ORDER REQUIRING SUPERSEDEAS BOND
2Per curiam
Pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.310(f), Donald S. Zuckerman moves for review of an order setting the amount of the supersedeas bond to be posted in order to stay the trial court’s order pending appeal. We grant the motion.
Appellee Hofrichter & Quiat, P.A., holds an unsatisfied judgment against Zucker-man. Hofrichter & Quiat served a writ of garnishment on Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co., which owed $75,000 to Zuck-erman. After evidentiary proceedings, the trial court entered an order rejecting Zuck-erman’s claim…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Florida Coast Bank of Pompano Beach v. MayesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Cerrito v. KovitchDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Dice v. CameronDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Wilson v. WoodwardDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Mosar Developers, Inc. v. Creech & Wilson, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
4Cited by2 opinions
- Hofrichter v. Zuckerman & VendittiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- Silver Beach Investments of Destin, LC v. Silver Beach Towers Property Owners Ass'nSupreme Court of Florida · 2017