South Carolina Tax Commission v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1DissentLittlejohn, Justice
(dissenting) :
I respectfully dissent and would affirm the order of the lower court.
The trial judge held that there was no waiver by the defendant and that the company’s practice of paying claims whenever they were properly presented had no effect upon, or relevance to, its legal rights under the Act after the bar of the statute of limitations had become complete.
*41I do not think that the position which the defendant has taken, relative to these claims, deprives it of the defense of the statute of limitations with regard to the policies here involved. The acknowledgments by the defendant’s…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bank of Am. Nat'l Trust & Sav. Ass'n v. CranstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- State v. El Paso Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1966