Legal Opinion

Maremont v. Olson

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided May 3, 1920No. 1285PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Assistant Commissioner of Patents, Interference proceeding's between Mej-er D. Maremont and Neis L. Olson. From a decision of the Assistant Commissioner o£ Patents, awarding priority to Olson, Maremont appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

SMYTH, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Patent Office awarding priority in an interference to Neis I,. Olson. The matter involved is an auxiliary spring attachable at the opposite ends of the axle housing of a Ford automobile, for the, purpose of converting a light car into a truck. The invention is set forth in two counts as follows:.

1. A spring structure for attachment to a vehicle having axle flanges, com prising a spring-supporting yoke having a face portion arranged for alta diluent to an axle flange, a siiring parallel to the yoke face portion, and means securing…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kennicott v. CapsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1920

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ruth v. GrochCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1922
  2. Massey v. RidgeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1921
  3. Thomson v. PearsonsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API