Legal Opinion

United States v. Celeste Sandra Arnold, Jerry Edward Arnold, Jr., and Larry Baker

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 21, 2001No. 99-50713, 99-50721 and 99-50722PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judge:

Celeste Sandra Arnold, Jerry Edward Arnold, Jr., and Larry Baker appeal their jury convictions of conspiracy to transport and harbor illegal aliens, transportation of illegal aliens and harboring of illegal aliens, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(ii), (iii) and (v)(II). They claim that their Sixth Amendment rights were violated because the district court judge was not physically present at the courthouse during jury deliberations. 2 We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm the convictions.

I

Jury deliberations in the joint trial of Celeste…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sand v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1985
  2. United States v. Joseph P. PfingstCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  3. Raymond F. Riley v. George DeedsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  4. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  5. Rice v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  2. United States v. HohnCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2024
  3. United States Ex Rel. Jones v. ChransDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2002
  4. People v. RhoadesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  5. People v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API