Legal Opinion

United States v. Sedighe Honarvar, United States of America v. Rahim Zamanian

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 26, 2007No. 06-2713, 06-2720PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEAM, Circuit Judge.

Rahim Zamanian and Sedighe Honarvar, husband and wife, appeal from guilty jury verdicts rendered on all counts on July 15, 2005. The couple was convicted of conspiracy, bank fraud, and making false statements for their scheme of fraudulently obtaining funds from various financing institutions. We affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

The following recitation of facts is stated in the light most favorable to the jury’s verdict. United States v. Stevens, 439 F.3d 983, 986 (8th Cir.2006). Honarvar and Zamanian carried out a fraudulent scheme to obtain funds by completing applications for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. United States v. Michael Gerald GamboaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
  3. United States v. Kurian ChackoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  4. United States v. DupreCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  5. United States v. Lee Vernell JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. United States v. WiestCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  2. United States v. Carmen GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
  3. United States v. SlaggCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  4. United States v. BercierCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
  5. United States v. Louper-MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API