Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re Samuel E. L.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 1, 1985Published

1Dissent

Callahan and Doerr, JJ.

(dissenting). We respectfully dissent. Without the admission given by respondent to the youth counselor, there is insufficient evidence to support the adjudication. Respondent, a 15-year-old youth, was charged with an act which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crime of attempted robbery. At the time of this incident, respondent was in the custody of the New York State Division for Youth (DFY) pursuant to a Family Court person in need of supervision (PINS) adjudication. At the hearing the DFY counselor testified, over objection, that respondent admitted…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. In re Stanley C.New York City Family Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API