Giusti v. Del Papa
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Dependant’s petition for a new trial. On plaintiff’s motion for reargument.
1Opinion of the CourtMatteson, C. J.
In our former re-script we held that the declaration set forth 'no cause of-action because, though it alleges that the defendant maliciously prosecuted the plaintiff and without probable cause, it went on to state that the defendant caused the plaintiff to be arrested and brought before the District Oourt. of the Tenth Judicial District and to be bound oyer by that court to await the action of the grand jury, and to be indicted, See. We ' were of the opinion that, though the declaration averred that the prosecution was without probable cause, that allegation was overborne by the averment that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Crescent City Live Stock Co. v. Batchers' Union Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Burt v. PlaceNew York Supreme Court · 1830
- Ross v. HixonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
- Spring v. BesoreCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1851
3Cited by9 opinions
- Nagy v. McBurneySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1978
- Penton v. CanningWyoming Supreme Court · 1941
- Stainer v. San Luis Valley Land & Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
- Hill v. Rhode Island State Employees' Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2007
- Putnam v. StalkerOregon Supreme Court · 1907
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.