Legal Opinion

Bjorklund v. Novo Nordisk A/S

District Court, W.D. Louisiana

Decided January 18, 2024No. 2:23-cv-01020Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION JACLYN BJORKLUND CASE NO. 2:23-CV-01020 VERSUS JUDGE JAMES D. CAIN, JR. NOVO NORDISK A/S ET AL MAGISTRATE JUDGE KAY MEMORANDUM RULING Before the court is a Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction, or in the Alternative to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Express Warranty Claim [doc. 73] filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2) and (6) by defendants Novo Nordisk A/S and Novo Nordisk North America Operations A/S (collectively, “NNAS”). Plaintiff opposes the motion. Doc. 79. I. BACKGROUND This products…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. J. McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. NicastroSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. David H. Stuart and Richard A. Whitaker v. Richard G. SpademanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API