Legal Opinion
Active Energy Group PLC v. Scalzo
District Court, D. Utah
Decided April 3, 2024No. 2:23-cv-00141Unknown
1Opinion
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH ACTIVE ENERGY GROUP, PLC, MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART [44] Plaintiff, PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO DISMISS, DENYING [49] DEFENDANT v. MCCARTHY’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE COUNTERCLAIM FOR PHIL SCALZO and DANIEL MCCARTHY, DECLARATORY RELIEF Defendants. Case No. 2:23-cv-00141-DBB-JCB District Judge David Barlow Before the court are two motions. The first is Plaintiff Active Energy Group, PLC’s (“AEG”) Motion to Dismiss, filed pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2).1 The second is Defendant Daniel McCarthy’s Motion for Leave to File Counterclaim…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Karin Sofia Ohlander, in the Matter of Julia Larson, a Minor Child, F/k/a Karin Sofia Larson v. Mark Andrew LarsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- County of Santa Fe v. Public Service Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Aerotech, Inc. v. Estes IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Brown v. BaekeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- American National Bank And Trust Company Of Sapulpa v. Bic CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.