Legal Opinion

Masters v. Courtesy Ford Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 29, 1999No. 32,275-CAPublished

1Opinion

ON REHEARING

LBROWN, J.,

On Rehearing.

Initially, the jury reached the factual question of causation and, finding none, needed to go no further. A reviewing court must accord great deference to the trier’s factual decision unless it is clearly wrong or, as in this case, untrustworthy because of the exclusion of material evidence. On rehearing, we reaffirm our original conclusions that the jury’s verdict is to be afforded no deference and, with the inclusion in the record of the previously sealed statement of Randy Rainwater, that causation can and should, in the interest of judicial economy, be…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Halphen v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
  2. Reeves v. Louisiana and Arkansas Railway Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
  3. Edwards v. SimsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
  4. Gordon v. Willis Knighton Medical CenterLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. Morgan v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1975

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API