Legal Opinion
Bruce v. Martin
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 19, 1991No. 90 Civ. 1002 (RWS)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendant Thomas A. Martin and various defendants aligned in interest with him (“the Kinderhill Defendants”) have moved pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(c) for judgment on the pleadings in this and two related cases, Bruce v. Martin, 87 Civ. 7737 (RWS) (“Bruce I”)1 and Malone v. Martin, 90 Civ. 4651 (RWS), and for an injunction preventing plaintiffs’ counsel from several related actions. For the following reasons, the motion is denied. Background
The parties, underlying facts, and prior proceedings are set forth in the prior opinions in this case and related cases,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McCreery v. . DayNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Eames Vacuum Brake Co. v. . ProsserNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Cox v. . StokesNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Lee v. Vacuum Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Plant City Steel Corp. v. National MacHinery Exchange, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1969
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bruce v. MartinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1994