Legal Opinion

Ferguson v. City of Chicago

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 2004No. 97218PublishedCited by 112 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rarick

Plaintiff, Pierre Ferguson, brought an action in the circuit court of Cook County to recover damages from defendant, the City of Chicago (the City), for malicious prosecution. The City moved to dismiss Ferguson’s action, arguing, inter alia, that it was barred by the one-year limitations period set forth in the Local Governmental and Governmental Employees Tort Immunity Act (745 ILCS 10/8 — 101 (West 2000)). The circuit court found the City’s limitations defense to be meritorious and dismissed Ferguson’s complaint pursuant to section 2 — 619(a)(5) of the Code of Civil Procedure (735 ILCS 5/2…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Feltmeier v. FeltmeierIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Swick v. LiautaudIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Cult Awareness Network v. Church of Scientology InternationalIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  4. People v. DanielsIllinois Supreme Court · 1999
  5. People v. SandersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by112 opinions

  1. Marshall v. Burger King Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Iseberg v. GrossIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Alvarez v. PappasIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Shirlena Barnes v. City of CentraliaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
  5. People v. HughesIllinois Supreme Court · 2013

107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API