Legal Opinion

Sinclair Refining Co. v. Tierney

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided September 7, 1928No. 3271PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

BICKLEY, J.

This is a suit by plaintiff (appellant) against defendant (appellee); its purpose being to have assets in the hands of the receiver impressed with a trust in favor of appellant in the sum of $350. The court denied the relief sought, and plaintiff appeals. The agreed statement of facts upon which the case was tried is as follows;

“That on May 15th, 192S, the Sinclair Refining Company, the plaintiff, transmitted to the Socorro State Bank a check of one G. C. York, dated April 28, 192S, which was drawn on the Socorro State Bank payable to the plaintiff, and had been…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. The People v. . the City Bank of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  2. Messenger v. Carroll Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
  3. Capital National Bank v. Coldwater National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Page County v. RoseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  5. Federal Reserve Bank v. MillspaughSupreme Court of Missouri · 1926

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Board Comr's., San Miguel Co. v. Ppl's Bk. Tst. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Walker Gilbert v. First St. Bk. of AlamogordoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API