Legal Opinion
Sinclair Refining Co. v. Tierney
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided September 7, 1928No. 3271PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
BICKLEY, J.
This is a suit by plaintiff (appellant) against defendant (appellee); its purpose being to have assets in the hands of the receiver impressed with a trust in favor of appellant in the sum of $350. The court denied the relief sought, and plaintiff appeals. The agreed statement of facts upon which the case was tried is as follows;
“That on May 15th, 192S, the Sinclair Refining Company, the plaintiff, transmitted to the Socorro State Bank a check of one G. C. York, dated April 28, 192S, which was drawn on the Socorro State Bank payable to the plaintiff, and had been…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- The People v. . the City Bank of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Messenger v. Carroll Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
- Capital National Bank v. Coldwater National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
- Page County v. RoseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- Federal Reserve Bank v. MillspaughSupreme Court of Missouri · 1926
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Board Comr's., San Miguel Co. v. Ppl's Bk. Tst. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1929
- Walker Gilbert v. First St. Bk. of AlamogordoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1928